The Sting IIの配信情報・視聴方法・感想

MOST VIEWED

アクセスランキング

直近7日間
  1. 1
    ウォーターワールド14 views
  2. 2
    踊る大捜査線13 views
  3. 3
    エニグマ12 views
  4. 4
    北極星11 views
  5. 5
    ディストラクション・ベイビーズ11 views
カテゴリー
The Sting II
1983

The Sting II

The Sting II

4.7
★★★★★TMDB評価 53件

この作品の日本語あらすじはまだ登録されていません。

出演
ジャッキー・グリーソン、Mac Davis、テリー・ガー、カール・マルデン、オリヴァー・リード
ジャンル
コメディ / 犯罪
上映時間
102分

HORROR TAGS

この作品のホラータグ

🌎洋ホラー😂ホラーコメディ系

WHERE TO WATCH

この作品を観られるサービス

配信情報提供 JustWatch

日本国内の配信情報は現在登録されていません。

※ 配信状況や料金は変更される場合があります。リンク先で最新情報をご確認ください。

YOUR REACTION

この作品、どうだった?

ゾクログユーザーのリアクション

怖さのタイプ

みんなの一言

まだコメントはありません。最初の一言を投稿しませんか?

一言コメントを投稿

投稿は編集部の確認後に公開されます。

OFFICIAL TRAILER

予告編

動画提供: YouTube / The Sting II trailer

作品紹介

作品情報を準備中です。

監督

出演者

AUDIENCE REVIEWS

TMDBユーザーの口コミ

原文のまま掲載
F
FilipeManuelNeto2023-09-13 · EN
★ 2.0
**We can almost say that any similarity with the first “Sting” is a pure coincidence.** I loved the first film, but when I saw that there had been a sequel, I was suspicious: normally, they are always much weaker than…

**We can almost say that any similarity with the first “Sting” is a pure coincidence.**

I loved the first film, but when I saw that there had been a sequel, I was suspicious: normally, they are always much weaker than the originals. And so it was! This film is nothing more than a pale shadow of its predecessor. It attempts to follow up the story of the con artists from the first film, with a script set four to five years later, however it is a much weaker, disjointed, conventional and predictable story. It's not really worth summarizing: suffice it to say that the crooks are back to avenge a comrade who was killed.

The cast is completely different from the original film, and that was one of the first red flags for me, even before the start. If the first film was a nest of first-rate artists like Robert Shaw, Robert Redford or Paul Newman, this film relies on weaker actors because the first ones didn't want to return to the project. And my red flags raised higher when I saw that it was another director, Jeremy Kagan. I don't know him, but I wasn't impressed with his work here.

When we talk about the actors, the best we have is Jackie Gleason. He's not great, but he does a good job, with commitment and some talent, that deserves a very positive note. Mac Davis is much less successful, not going much beyond average. The same can be said of Karl Malden and Teri Garr, who do not shine in their roles. It's very little and doesn't meet the expectations at all, especially those of the public who saw the original film.

Technically, the film shines due to its cinematography, good color and initial credits, which are a nod to the original film. This was very enjoyable and gave the film a really nice family comedy feel. I also liked most of the sets and costumes, as well as the period recreation. The problem is the soundtrack. If the first film used intelligently a series of melodies by Scott Joplin, one of the great composers in vogue at the time, this film was completely unable to do a similar exercise. However, the original soundtrack made by Lalo Schiffrin was good enough to deserve an Oscar nomination. The only nomination, which is still another bad note if we consider that the first film was nominated ten times and “cleaned” the auditorium by taking seven statuettes.

TMDBで口コミを見る ↗

口コミはTMDBユーザーによる投稿です。ゾクログの見解を示すものではありません。

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

この作品を見ている人はこんなものも見ています