バニー・レークは行方不明の配信情報・視聴方法・感想

MOST VIEWED

アクセスランキング

直近7日間
  1. 1
    ウォーターワールド14 views
  2. 2
    踊る大捜査線13 views
  3. 3
    エニグマ12 views
  4. 4
    北極星11 views
  5. 5
    ディストラクション・ベイビーズ11 views
カテゴリー
バニー・レークは行方不明
1965

バニー・レークは行方不明

Bunny Lake Is Missing

7.2
★★★★★TMDB評価 223件

アメリカからロンドンに越して来たアンは、保育園に預けた4歳の娘バニーを迎えに行くが姿が見つからない。アンは兄スティーブンに助けを求め、行方不明になった娘を必死に捜すが、全く手がかりがつかめない。捜査にあたったニューハウス警視は、そもそも娘など存在せず、アンの妄想なのではないかと疑念を抱く…。少女をめぐる異様な事件を、名匠オットー・プレミンジャー監督が強烈なモノクロ映像で描く傑作サイコサスペンス。

出演
ローレンス・オリヴィエ、キャロル・リンレー、キア・デュリア、マーティタ・ハント、アンナ・マッセイ
ジャンル
謎 / スリラー
上映時間
107分

HORROR TAGS

この作品のホラータグ

🌎洋ホラー

WHERE TO WATCH

この作品を観られるサービス

配信情報提供 JustWatch

※ 配信状況や料金は変更される場合があります。リンク先で最新情報をご確認ください。

YOUR REACTION

この作品、どうだった?

ゾクログユーザーのリアクション

怖さのタイプ

みんなの一言

まだコメントはありません。最初の一言を投稿しませんか?

一言コメントを投稿

投稿は編集部の確認後に公開されます。

OFFICIAL TRAILER

予告編

動画提供: YouTube / Bunny Lake Is Missing (1965) Original Trailer [FHD]

作品紹介

アメリカからロンドンに越して来たアンは、保育園に預けた4歳の娘バニーを迎えに行くが姿が見つからない。アンは兄スティーブンに助けを求め、行方不明になった娘を必死に捜すが、全く手がかりがつかめない。捜査にあたったニューハウス警視は、そもそも娘など存在せず、アンの妄想なのではないかと疑念を抱く…。少女をめぐる異様な事件を、名匠オットー・プレミンジャー監督が強烈なモノクロ映像で描く傑作サイコサスペンス。

ある日突然少女が消えた... 誘拐? それとも彼女など初めからいなかったのか?

監督

出演者

AUDIENCE REVIEWS

TMDBユーザーの口コミ

原文のまま掲載
J
John Chard2019-05-30 · EN
★ 9.0
Just out of reach. Bunny Lake is Missing is directed by Otto Preminger and adapted to screenplay by John & Penelope Mortimer from the novel of the same name written by Marryam Modell (AKA: Evelyn Piper). It stars Lau…

Just out of reach.

Bunny Lake is Missing is directed by Otto Preminger and adapted to screenplay by John & Penelope Mortimer from the novel of the same name written by Marryam Modell (AKA: Evelyn Piper). It stars Laurence Olivier, Carol Lynley, Keir Dullea, Martita Hunt & Noel Coward. Music is by Paul Glass and cinematography by Denys N. Coop. 1960s Brit Pop combo The Zombies also feature in the film.

Ann Lake (Lynley) turns up at her daughter's school to collect her after her first day there, but nobody has any recollection of ever having seen the four year old...

It was a film that irked Otto Preminger, he was never happy with the finished product, this even after changing the ending from the one in the novel and relocating the story from New York to London. Yet time has been very kind to the film, after re-evaluations from auteurist critics the film has found a sturdy fan-base, giving it cult classic status and a reputation as a sleeper classic of its type. You feel that with its thematic links to Hitchcock's Psycho, Preminger wanted to make a film worthy of being in the same league as Hitch's classic. Certainly the marketing for the film lends one to think the makers wanted to be compared with it, that it of course isn't on a par with Psycho is a given, otherwise it would be more well known. But it's a damn fine picture, stitched together impeccably by Preminger, film holds attention and intrigue from Saul Bass' nifty opening credit sequence, right to the eerie denouement.

Here we go round the mulberry bush, The mulberry bush, The mulberry bush. Here we go round the mulberry bush on a cold and frosty morning.

With real London locations used and Coop's pin sharp black and white (shadowy) photography tight to the unsettling mood, story carries an air of psychological discord about it. The mystery element is strong, and this coupled with the edgy, near unhealthy, relationship between Ann and her brother Stephen (Dullea), makes for a "shifting in your seat" experience. Then there's the small matter of Noel Coward as Horatio Wilson, creepy landlord extraordinaire, he may not be in it for much, but the impression made creeps the flesh. Slotted into the tight narrative are scenes that the likes of Hitchcock, Welles and Kubrick would be proud of, where Preminger calls on his film noir know how to feverishly glide around a doll shop and track his actors as they cavort around a children's garden play area. All topped off by the supreme performance of Olivier as analytical Superintendent Newhouse, a man calm and versed in psychology, he is the perfect contrast to the hysteria and borderline mania that surrounds him.

Is it Hitchcockian? As some critics have called it? Well yes it is, but not overtly so, it has closer links in tone and narrative thrust to under seen British thrillers like Don't Talk to Strange Men (1962) and Taste of Fear (1961). Is it flawless? No! Dullea is way too animated, some character reactions to situations are eyebrow-raising and Paul Glass' score is at times maddeningly wrong for the mood sequence it accompanies. But they are problems easily forgivably when taking the film as a whole. 8.5/10

TMDBで口コミを見る ↗

口コミはTMDBユーザーによる投稿です。ゾクログの見解を示すものではありません。

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

この作品を見ている人はこんなものも見ています